Logo Watch Movies & TV Shows

Lord of the Flies (1990)

VIP Only! Movies older than 6 months and TV show episodes older than 3 months are available only to subscribed users.

Become a subscriber and you'll have:

  • Unlimited streaming access on more than 50k movies and TV shows
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Follow up and be notified on your favorite upcoming movies and episodes
  • Watch offline: download without limits
  • Lists & favorites
  • Your account on all devices (mobile, TV, XBox, ...)
  • Customer service on live chat!
Start your subscription now 10 minutes preview

Movie Cast

Reviews

10/10: Dismissed In 1990, This Version...
Saturday, May 23, 2009

Dismissed In 1990, This Version Of Lord Of The Flies Holds Up Remarkably Well! When the new version of Lord Of The Flies hit screens in 1990, it was critically savaged, mostly for being among that most maligned of film categories, the "remake". Lord Of The Flies had already been made into an austere, critically revered, Black & White film in 1963, so an updated version, filmed in color, using American kids instead of British kids was considered a sacrilege.Both film versions of Lord Of The Flies were based on the novel by Nobel prize winning author Sir William Golding and tell the story of a group of boys from a boarding school who end up stranded on a deserted tropical island when their plane crashes. Although they initially try to live with order and rules, it doesn't take long for the boys to descend into savagery. William Golding was a former schoolteacher who dealt with pre-adolescent oiks...

4/10: Not bad... But 1963 version...
Thursday, March 1, 2007

Not bad... But 1963 version far superior Having read Golding's novel, and being a fan of the original film version I approached this remake with some apprehension. It is flawed, but I wasn't disgusted with the result. It is OK. Doesn't hold a candle to the original, though, which kind of defeats the purpose. Much of the story is the same, and follows the same pattern, of the original, in which scenes, and plot turns are directly from the novel, and which are left out. The strengths of this version lie mostly in the photography, and use of colour. The tropical island, and physical changes are captured well. The opening shots, underwater, are particularly well done. The characterizations are not bad, overall. The chase at the end, is well depicted. The problems with this rendering, however, do tend to outweigh the good points. Most notably- The concept of "The Beast", and the more simplified relationships, and characters...

5/10: Not great but reasonably watchable...
Thursday, December 17, 2009

Not great but reasonably watchable I read the novel in tenth grade English class and remember watching both of the movies in class the week after finishing the book, but it had been several years since I'd seen this version and when it came on TV last weekend I decided to watch it.The first thing that I noticed was that so much of the symbolic imagery was either lost or heavily modified, I'm not sure if the writer really understood the story's themes or got the meaning of some of the imagery of the story with important scenes changed and a great deal of the character development was left out entirely which makes the script feels like the cole's notes version of the story.Among the more glaring changes were:In the book Simon was an allegory for Jesus while in the movie he's looked at as being "weird", they completely ignored the mystical...

6/10: I have very mixed feelings...
Sunday, June 26, 2005

I have very mixed feelings about this movie When I was in 10th grade, I read the novel Lord of the Flies in English class, and right after that, we watched this movie. I really loved the novel so I was excited about seeing the movie. The novel Lord of the Flies is very provocative. While it stands as one of the greatest novels of the 20th century, it also stands as one of the most controversial and frequently banned novels of the century. For a novel of that much greatness, it is hard for a movie to do it any justice.Part of the reason for why Lord of the Flies is a classic and is still read today is because of its theme, which involves kids killing each other. There has always been a sensation and terror about that kind of theme. This movie tries to catch that theme, while it succeeds at being a disturbing movie, it...

6/10: not great but watchable I...
Saturday, April 9, 2005

not great but watchable I don't know what it is with all the reviewers who seem to enjoy smashing this Hollywood remake of the 1960s version to pieces. Apparently they can't stand this adaptation for a more modern audience who - like me - found the earlier version technically poor, acted very poorly, and going at a stultifying pace guaranteed to put you to sleep long before the end. Yes, there's maybe a bit too much swearing in this version, and it takes several liberties with the scenario, in sharp contrast to the slavishly faithful earlier adaptation, but my feeling is that many reviewers failed to consider, for one thing, that this is an American adaptation made for an American audience and so, naturally, the Britishness of the story simply had to go out the window. Everyone does what they're best at, right? Having said this, it's time to point out why this version is actually, although...

Internet Reviews

See ratings and reviews from viewers on IMDb: User Reviews (5400)

Write your review

Recommendations

Sharing Is Caring!

Spread the word about Trailers.to and we'll keep on being top-notch for you!